Can we agree that we who are discussing 'what is a bro?' are actually Twitter-bros (women included)? Polluting others feeds douchebaggilly?
Conversation
Replying to
if we all start our threads w/ your username we can avoid that.
1
Replying to
wouldn't help people who follow all @ mentioned people I think, which is a lot due to small-world graph effects
1
Replying to
I find both useful, it's a behavioral archetype so not directly discriminatory without extra qualifiers. Like 'violent' or 'rude'
1
that's filetypes and variables I believe :)... the clothing metaphor works better, but is an odd usage.
and is this the same as work/play in back/front and is back the same as non-existent? this needs work :D
Replying to
If you're self-aware enough to make that statement I'm not sure you can be a bro. A bro would think they're improving feeds.
1
Replying to
A real bro is limited to 1-10 ppl. They know your Mom. They respect your family and would do anything legal to help. Time tested & rare
Replying to
2nd use of "Bro!" before you get in their face. "Bro! I know you weren't gonna leave that empty beer can on my lawn." Kind of an out
1



