. you could do a real public service with a Gervais Principleian analysis of the US presidential scenarios from here. Open source wiki?
Conversation
Replying to
how would it be a public service? Also don't really see how it applies. We seem to be in diff regime.
1
Replying to
1/ your diagram is right if the intent is to identify a key motor of change at any point in the cycle. Which means GP less salient now
2
1
6/ more prosaically, Hillary and Trump are prototypical Boomer sociopaths, in GP terms, whose paths to here are explained thru GP lens
1
1
Replying to
hmm I have to think about it..this seems too simple. There are more variables.
1
1
Replying to
I agree. But all useful models are powerful over simplifications. I think there's an opportunity to apport something useful. That's all
1
Replying to
no I mean, gp is fundamentally an organization level model and nations seem to have vars that are more important than gp vars
it's like applying planet physics to sun...missing the fusion means you're missing essence even if you get some lesser phenomena
1
1
Replying to
hmm maybe. Obvious comparisons to sociopaths and clueless suggest themselves. Plus it's kitchen sink time here. Grab a berth

