. you could do a real public service with a Gervais Principleian analysis of the US presidential scenarios from here. Open source wiki?
Conversation
Replying to
how would it be a public service? Also don't really see how it applies. We seem to be in diff regime.
1
Replying to
1/ your diagram is right if the intent is to identify a key motor of change at any point in the cycle. Which means GP less salient now
2
1
6/ more prosaically, Hillary and Trump are prototypical Boomer sociopaths, in GP terms, whose paths to here are explained thru GP lens
1
1
Replying to
hmm I have to think about it..this seems too simple. There are more variables.
Replying to
I agree. But all useful models are powerful over simplifications. I think there's an opportunity to apport something useful. That's all
1
Replying to
no I mean, gp is fundamentally an organization level model and nations seem to have vars that are more important than gp vars
1
1
Show replies

