1/ Hypothesis: there are technologies so basic that they serve as prequels to economic organization and utility vs. private type debates
Conversation
Replying to
2/ Possible examples: Craigslist, Twitter, Unix shell. One maybe: Wikipedia. They are all sui generis and defy analysis within categories
2
3
22
Replying to
3/ They are destined neither for commodity status as private sector technologies, nor for utility status as public services.
1
3
13
Replying to
4/ What they do instead is *create* frontier land, sparking land-grab economic races.
1
5
24
Replying to
5/ Twitter "running a clown car into a gold mine" is closer to Columbus (yeah yeah) discovering America than a company executing on an idea
2
9
20
Replying to
6/ Unix shell is a more subtle example, but I mean it in the sense of "every shell command becomes a unicorn business" (who said that? PG?)
2
6
15
Replying to
7/ One reason these entities "fail" as both business and utility entities is that they discover territories too vast for one entity to own
2
8
28
Replying to
8/ Pattern already clear with Craigslist: it doesn't get "disrupted". Instead companies like AirBnB bite off chunks small enough for 1 corp
2
4
23
Replying to
9/ Twitter "failing" to own the revolutions it obviously caused (messaging, bots) isn't a failure really if viewed that way.
2
4
26
Replying to
10/ People who think Slack, Snapchat etc. have "stolen" Twitter's business are both right and wrong. Right because it's prima facie true...
1
2
15
Replying to
11/ Wrong because it's very incomplete. There's like 10-15 Slack/Snapchat sized businesses left to carve out of the "Twitter continent"
Replying to
12/ Examples: Nobody has "pulled a Slack" on "political revolutions" product that's inside Twitter, or the "nascent community" product
1
2
17
Replying to
13/ Proposed lifecycle for such sector squatting precorps, which I will call Supernovas
2
3
15
Show replies
