Conversation

Replying to
12/ This will of course be wrong at the margins. Prior odds for/against certain people becoming net assets/liabilities may be huge
1
8
Replying to
13/ Safety net should be designed with "good" failure in mind for 10-15 trial-and-error pivot opps btwn 14-30. Current: all failure is bad
1
21
Replying to
14/ Biggest point of contention in system design: is "dignity" (as opposed to food, shelter, healthcare) a safety net variable?
2
18
Replying to
15/ Pointless humiliation (being paternalistically given "food" stamps instead of cash to buy "vegetables" like pizza) should be avoided...
1
18
Replying to
16/ But it's a big leap from abandoning designed-by-cronyism-for-cronyism safety nets in favor of cash to thinking UBI can "solve" dignity
2
9
Replying to
17/ There's no alternate path to dignity besides earning admiration of the broad slice of society that bets on your value through good work
3
21
Replying to
18/ If only other art historians think you're valuable, or only other Ruby programmers think you are valuable, that's not enough
2
14
Replying to
19/ If you can't validate you value to the whole society that invests in you through support of a diverse, representative subset...
1
12
Replying to
20/ ...you're just part of a weak special interest trying to grow into a large, too-big-to-fail special interest. No different from bankers
3
16