6/ College education choices are where these two hypocrisies meet, creating a perfect storm of stupidity
Conversation
Replying to
7/ The conceit of neoliberalism is that 19-year-olds can place error-free 40-year bets and deserve only debt-funding, bearing all the risk
2
39
67
Replying to
8/ The conceit of progressivism is that education choices are human-dignity affirmations for which societies should shoulder all risk
1
18
34
Replying to
9/ What when this thing melts down? Neoliberals will want the banks bailed out and the debtors abandoned. Progressives will want a jubilee.
2
5
16
Replying to
10/ Post-secondary education should be managed as equity rather than debt, with risk distributed across individuals, institutions, society
5
21
43
Replying to
11/ Every human should be considered a startup of unknown future economic value at 14, not a priori a net asset or liability in NPV terms
1
12
42
Replying to
12/ This will of course be wrong at the margins. Prior odds for/against certain people becoming net assets/liabilities may be huge
1
2
8
Replying to
13/ Safety net should be designed with "good" failure in mind for 10-15 trial-and-error pivot opps btwn 14-30. Current: all failure is bad
1
7
21
Replying to
14/ Biggest point of contention in system design: is "dignity" (as opposed to food, shelter, healthcare) a safety net variable?
2
3
18
Replying to
15/ Pointless humiliation (being paternalistically given "food" stamps instead of cash to buy "vegetables" like pizza) should be avoided...
1
2
18
Replying to
17/ There's no alternate path to dignity besides earning admiration of the broad slice of society that bets on your value through good work
3
1
21
Replying to
18/ If only other art historians think you're valuable, or only other Ruby programmers think you are valuable, that's not enough
2
3
14
Show replies
Replying to

