Conversation

Replying to
4/ In a creative-class dominant economy, you can't invest in humans like pieces of equipment for which you're predicting demand 40 years out
1
50
Replying to
5/ Both neoliberalism, progressivism share a single existential concern today: investing effectively in humans. Both respond with hypocrisy
1
34
Replying to
7/ The conceit of neoliberalism is that 19-year-olds can place error-free 40-year bets and deserve only debt-funding, bearing all the risk
2
67
Replying to
8/ The conceit of progressivism is that education choices are human-dignity affirmations for which societies should shoulder all risk
1
34
Replying to
9/ What when this thing melts down? Neoliberals will want the banks bailed out and the debtors abandoned. Progressives will want a jubilee.
2
16
Replying to
10/ Post-secondary education should be managed as equity rather than debt, with risk distributed across individuals, institutions, society
5
43
Replying to
11/ Every human should be considered a startup of unknown future economic value at 14, not a priori a net asset or liability in NPV terms
1
42
Replying to
12/ This will of course be wrong at the margins. Prior odds for/against certain people becoming net assets/liabilities may be huge
1
8
Replying to
13/ Safety net should be designed with "good" failure in mind for 10-15 trial-and-error pivot opps btwn 14-30. Current: all failure is bad
1
21
Replying to
15/ Pointless humiliation (being paternalistically given "food" stamps instead of cash to buy "vegetables" like pizza) should be avoided...
1
18
Replying to
16/ But it's a big leap from abandoning designed-by-cronyism-for-cronyism safety nets in favor of cash to thinking UBI can "solve" dignity
2
9
Show replies