You can't get to 'X is good' starting from 'X is bad' and removing 'flaws.' That just converges towards 'X is vacuous' and you tossing it...
-
-
Replying to @vgr
...where X=markets, corporations, bureaucracies, courts, political parties, banks, schools, money, debt, credit, capital, welfare...
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @vgr
...to get to 'X is good' you have to restart from 'why X?' and ask who hijacked that question, how, and why. Then you add a balancing force
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @vgr
...and yes this means increasing complexity. Get over it. Civilization is increasing complexity. All backslides have been local, temporary
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
...'Why X' is existential question of X. It must be maintained in a renewable state so you can always productively ask, but never exhaust it
0 replies
1 retweet
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.