You can't get to 'X is good' starting from 'X is bad' and removing 'flaws.' That just converges towards 'X is vacuous' and you tossing it...
Conversation
Replying to
...where X=markets, corporations, bureaucracies, courts, political parties, banks, schools, money, debt, credit, capital, welfare...
2
1
3
Replying to
...to get to 'X is good' you have to restart from 'why X?' and ask who hijacked that question, how, and why. Then you add a balancing force
1
2
5
Show replies
Replying to
are there exceptions? Seems rigid. Implies that someone with this thinking needs a complete reboot of banks, schools, gov, to be good.
1
Replying to
the opposite. If you think banks are bad and try to reform them, you'll self-radicalize.
Replying to
to restart would mean to put a "hold" on the lives affected until you answer for 'why X?'. You could ruin lives in the meantime.
1
Replying to
restarting your thinking is not the same as restarting the thing you're thinking about! In fact it's usually the opposite.


