The idea of a public "record" that you're "on" or "off" and "newspapers of record" is obsolete. Instead, you're either in or out of context.
Conversation
Replying to
There *is* a place for a notion of a "record": a courtroom. Where things are arranged to be highly context free and impersonal for a reason
1
4
4
Replying to
The idea of a "court of public opinion" used to be figurative. Now it's kinda a literal thing that exists, and it is a weird beast.
1
1
9
Replying to
It adopts ideas from courtrooms when convenient. A "record" is convenient. Rigorous argumentation rules that create context-freedom are not
1
2
2
Replying to
I think this is one reason I instinctively write in highly context-sensitive ways: subtweeting, dogwhistling (for good) and steganography
2
1
8
Replying to
It's insurance: make sure you're understood by the people you want to be understood by, and sound as close to noise as possible to others
4
5
18
Replying to
This is the part I'm most interested in - because it seems empirically / observationally we *are* sliding into insular tribalism.
4
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more


