. I disagree. That's asking for candy for every try. Key is to get addicted to method itself, not effects or insights it produces
Conversation
Replying to
Like Mathletics competitors? I think that's asking too much of the method itself.
2
Replying to
I mean, think of any skill you perform daily on easy problems: dialing a phone, touch-typing, crossing the street, making coffee.
3
1
Replying to
those are easy and limited in scope rather than generative in scope like math methods
1
1
Replying to
I didn't say lots of easy. That doesn't work for anything. Math training is progressive difficulty usually.
1
Replying to
Oh, in that case I agree — hundreds of *different* problems, each a little harder than the last? That's ideal.
3
Replying to
yeah, look at the books of S. L. Loney (Brit) and I. E. Irodov (Russian) for the sorts of math regimens classmates and I trained on
2
Replying to
1
1
Replying to
yeah, they're all cheap out-of-copyright texts with 10-20% concepts, 80% exercises of increasing difficulty
1
1
Replying to
I wonder if maybe the problem is not that Yankees are spoiled but that their textbooks are total shit?
1
2
Replying to
not sure it's a problem yet. Just an best cation so far. Could have upside.
