determined by the types of social relations that you investigate in be slightly evil / gervais
Conversation
Replying to
i suppose, but it felt like it has an underlying assumption that the fruits of, like, disruptive labor necessarily go to its originator
1
Replying to
in some kind of meritocratic way that can disrupt existing heirarchies vs being based on the meta-game of human interactions, which
Replying to
doesn't have any kind of guiding ethos except will-to-power/what can/can't be done

