Conversation

Replying to
11/ In general, if there is a need to cut costs by X, 10% will come from function degradation, 90% from increasing risk via "leaning"
1
7
Replying to
12/ Of that 90%, almost all will happen in parts of ops that will affect the vulnerable more. Not today, but at some unknown future date
1
4
Replying to
13/ Complex infrastructure inherently involves moral hazard because of this: experts manage risk distributions via cost cuts over time
1
8
Replying to
14/ In this, impacted parties are not blameless. They usually knowingly overallocate resources to function X over insurance of function X
1
2
Replying to
15/ How do you tell real efficiency increases from fragility-for-cost tradeoffs? Follow the information. Real thing embodies new knowledge
1
4
Replying to
16/ When you can't find any new information embodied by an evolved system, but it's cheaper, then it is more fragile
2
5
Replying to
17/ If you find a new information embodied locally, then there is some real efficiency increase and some risk moved elsewhere
2
4
Replying to
18/ Local new information perturbs information balance of power and some moral hazard, leading to some *new* exploitation of info-neighbors
1
1
Replying to
19/ Finally, true global information injected into a system (rare, == "disruption") can increase efficiency without fragility
1
7
Replying to
20/ (of course I mean only limited global: where social costs beyond boundary become part of market dynamics beyond any top-down control)
1
3