@GabrielDuquette I think your 1-2 is correct; I also think it doesn't fully encompass Ribbonfarm language which is as much style as utility
-
-
Replying to @suspendedreason
@froscixp
@GabrielDuquette if it helps, the "ribbonfarm code", is bug, not feature, result of exploring w/o attn to audience, not intent1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@froscixp
@GabrielDuquette In my own writing, and via editorial suggestion, that of residents, inner direction >>> reader feedback1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@froscixp
@GabrielDuquette no deliberate obfuscation or construction of inner language (except tongue in cheek), just "follow the idea"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@froscixp
@GabrielDuquette this has emergent effect of creating barrier to entry that's neither jargon nor "level" based, but history based1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@froscixp @GabrielDuquette i.e. though most posts are stand-alone, the more of the archives you've read, the more you'll get out of it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.