High-cost engineering (==low-cost product) tends to create lower-hackability/bricolage-potential products. True or false? Good or bad?
-
-
@vgr 2/n: Hackability depends on effective identity spoofing. You should be able convince the 'host system' of the legitimacy of identity. -
@dubeyaneesh@vgr True for one def of 'hack'. For a wider definition replace identity with intension. See: http://xkcd.com/1494/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@vgr I'd look at availability of "tools" …bio hacking used to be extremely difficult now much easier due to rapid gene sequencing tools -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@vgr so multidimensional metric 1 dimension tools, 2nd dimension ???Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr Ratio of leverage points to outcomes (systems theory), weighted by outcome's distance from core function & potential to transcend sameThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr everything is hackable, especially biological systems. the knowledge to do so expands combinatorically in step with system complexity.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr re hackability metric: affordance, modularity, granularity (complexity of parts) should play a role - just a gut feelingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr 6/6 (n=6) think cold war sleeper agents, master of disguise spies, democrat looking Republicans....Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr 2nd dimension do you have a model of how the thing functions…even…so range 0-1; 0: no model, 1: totally understand the thingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.