solution is to not give a shit, like dawkins.
Conversation
Replying to
that's not really a solution. It's failing to adapt your influence strategy to the scale of your reach.
1
1
Replying to
in what world? There's always people who will disagree. If you have a million followers you use them by NOT being a pussy
2
Replying to
In general, the ones who make a great show of "not being a pussy" have the most cowardly echo-chamberish conversations with choir
1
Replying to
it's almost like it's impossible to have honest interesting conversations with 100 thousand people at once
1
1
Replying to
Reed's Law. You get them having interesting conversations with each other, not you.
1
Replying to
Am I confused? Are we not talking public figure with thousands of followers?
1
Replying to
yes, go look up a good sample and note how some of them handle it way more effectively than others. Pick your faves. I have mine
Replying to
ok teacher I guess I'll go do my homework
1
1
Replying to
:D I'm just trying to avoid the bunnytrail of discussing individual celebs' twitter strategies, not teach a lesson

