A sincere belief in the plausibility of large-scale (n>150, Dunbar's number say) secrecy is the main clueless trait in conspiracy thinking
Conversation
Replying to
I suspect you could discover a constitutive law relating the speed with which a secret is leaked and the number of people who know it at t=0
5
10
20
Replying to
Human fraud/deceit detection evolved I think for accuracy at small hunter-gatherer group sizes, intuitions way off at larger scale
1
4
8
Replying to
There is a scale of secret-keeping beyond which it is easier to slow the diffusion by adding noise to leaks rather than trying to contain it
2
6
12
Replying to
This is the FUD point of a secret. D-Day involved FUD-defense of adding noise of Calais as landing location to keep Normandy less plausible
1
2
6
Replying to
When the energy/financial signature of a secret is too big to be hidden, you have to start "hiding" it in a sea of half-plausible accounts
2
3
6
Replying to
Ironically, at this stage, conspiracy theorists are part of the *mechanism* of keeping secrets, not people who reveal them
3
9
24
Replying to
Cryptography is just the nerdy-sexy tip of iceberg of sociology of secrecy. Steganography and conspiracy noise-mixing are higher-order arts
6
7
20
Replying to
Secrets don't leak when they hit NYT. That's the commoditization. They leak with first unauthorized knower exploiting it for unintended gain
2
2
6
Replying to
Okay, final thought in this on-the-DL tweetstorm: all mathematics is a conspiracy theory about the universe.
Replying to
1
1
6
Replying to
You know Plato's cave metaphor? There is a Platonic view of mathematics.
Replying to
reality is a group delusion about the nature of computation and thought
1
1



