Hmm, article by on Gladwell refers to Murray Davis paper. That *is* v Interesting, no, ?
Conversation
Replying to
Interesting, yes. Explains 50% of Gladwell. The other 50, unfortunately, is pandering to flattering self images.
Replying to
He has brought interesting concepts to popularity but glib tone at times + some brutal exposes on him
1
Replying to
haven’t looked at him the same since the Harvard donation rant. Still love his style, just hear diff tone.
1



