hm - surprisingly, no. i found far more difference in my recent dune reread
Conversation
Replying to
Dune I never got past #3 I think. I can't really get into deeply built worlds. I like impressionist worlds.
2
Replying to
hmm... no. That is an intriguing bit evocative imagery. Fits with idea I've been vaguely pursuing of time as aperiodic tesellations.
1
Replying to
1
Replying to
1
1
Replying to
1
Replying to
Surely if you're using double-headed arrows, you don't need to do both M <-> K and K <-> M? (insane levels of pedantry alert).
1
1
Replying to
They will have 2 duplex convs, 1 each focused on each in turn. In algebraic topology, you specify base point for a cycle. Hah!
2
Show replies


