Query to anyone who knows the suttas well: The Sigalovada says the highest duty of layman is to support "ascetics and brahmins." Anomalous?
Conversation
Replying to
Isn't it odd for a Buddhist text to recommend supporting brahmins, rather than monks? Or is "ascetics" actually "bhikkhus"?
2
Replying to
It's interesting that many of the summaries I read on the web do replace "ascetics and brahmins" with "monks" (inaccurately, I take it?).
1
Replying to
Based on this and other inconsistencies, I suspect the Sigalovada is a brahmanical text, lightly edited, and slipped into the suttapitaka.
1
Replying to
But I don't read Pali and I don't know the suttas at all well, so maybe this suspicion is obviously wrong?
1
Replying to
The Sigalovada Sutta is a key text for "Buddhist ethics," so if it's actually brahmanical, some rethinking might be called for.
2
Replying to
brahmins basically pwned the sangha in the first 100 years after B's death. Basic Indian history fact on 8th grade tests
2
2
Replying to
Reason Buddhism died in India is mainly (R^2=0.6) that people couldn't tell it apart from brahmin priesthood
Replying to
Then American history is wrong. I've actually been to Bodhgaya temple. Has been run by hindu brahmin priests for 2000+ years
1
2
Replying to
Yes, that much I know… Although I would have guessed a few centuries less.
1
Show replies

