@kimmaicutler they're still not infrastructure, they're tools
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler ...and to operate, they rely on infrastructure that some places in the U.S. still don't have.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Your argument here seems to be a straw man. Sure, phones are important. Lots of ppl have them. They're not infrastructure.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Susie Cagle Retweeted Susie Cagle
Susie Cagle added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@susie_c Engineer's defn: shared parts of tech systems invisible to users. Political definition: easy job creation zones.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@kimmaicutler@susie_c I suspect a games-toys conflation here. You can do serious things or play games with either toys or "real" tools1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@kimmaicutler @susie_c Infrastructure=orthogonal idea: how connected tool OR toy is to a backend shared system/how useless if disconnected
-
-
Replying to @vgr
@kimmaicutler@susie_c My 2 old aeon posts on infrastructure http://aeon.co/magazine/society/americas-artificial-heartland/ … and toys vs tools http://aeon.co/magazine/society/what-does-silicon-valley-tell-us-about-innovation/ …0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.