David Manheim - @davidmanheim@techpolicy.social@davidmanheim·Jul 6, 2015Interesting, @vgr. Still, trying to constrain future possibilities to where our descendants are better off is good.Quote TweetVenkatesh Rao@vgr·Jul 6, 2015Noble thought of the day: To leave the future free for future generations we must leave it uncertain for ourselves.1
Venkatesh Rao@vgrReplying to @davidmanheim.@davidmanheim 'better off' = paternalistic pre-emption. But "more likely to be alive to decide what 'better off' means" = freedom11:47 PM · Jul 6, 20151 Retweet1 Like
David Manheim - @davidmanheim@techpolicy.social@davidmanheim·Jul 7, 2015Replying to @vgr@vgr more likely to be alive is important, but richer as a society helps - and all actions have consequences. There is no neutral decision.