@atduskgreg @paulbaumgart I see ideologues of all sorts as lacking courage to decide that larger-than-human truths exist and begin somewhere
-
-
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@paulbaumgart Really? In America at least I see far more ideologues claiming they have unique hold on larger-than-human truth.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart ah that's just religion :) I mean more important things like deciding 2+2=4 is not about racism or LGBT rights1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart I trust myself to decide where the science ends, politics begins there :) My point is it's not ALL politics3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@paulbaumgart I trust myself to the extent to which I know the systemic institutional biases shaping research subjects and incentives.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart I think we actually agree on a lot. We just value things very differently. Specifically human meatbags.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@paulbaumgart Have you read any Latour? Specifically We Have Never Been Modern or other Actor Network Theory stuff?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atduskgreg
@atduskgreg@paulbaumgart yes I have, and yes you're right re my reaction. Overall I like him though.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@paulbaumgart His analytical method reminds me of you, but I can’t imagine a philosophical position further from yours.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@atduskgreg @paulbaumgart I like ANT as a philosophy of technology, not as a philosophy of science, math or logic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.