Many people confuse being interested in the ontology of empiricism ("types" of facts and numbers) for actual empiricism. Map vs. territory.
Conversation
Replying to
I don't claim to be super data-driven, but when I do look at data, I look at data. Not philosophical models of data.
1
2
Replying to
Is it bad to be more interested in the ontology of empiricism, or just bad to confuse them?
1
Show replies
@SanguineEmpiric @wargfranklin low end? I also don't have a clue what philosophical models of data would be!
Replying to
I'm certainly not one of those people interested in the "ontology of empiricism"--whatever that could be.


