Guess rule behind this sequence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...? You can ask me whether 3 other sequences fit the rule too. (shh if you've seen this)
Conversation
Replying to
In an (unfinished) essay for Less Wrong, wrote the would-be-definitive-if-he-finished-it discussion of this problem.
1
Replying to
1
Replying to
1
1
Replying to
Principle of multiple explanations. Combine both: "Search your feelings with Solomonoff induction, Luke."
1
Replying to
3
3
Replying to
We're on parallel paths I see. I assume you've had fun with Gettier counterexamples too? :) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_p
Replying to
1


