Guess rule behind this sequence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...? You can ask me whether 3 other sequences fit the rule too. (shh if you've seen this)
Conversation
Replying to
In an (unfinished) essay for Less Wrong, wrote the would-be-definitive-if-he-finished-it discussion of this problem.
1
Replying to
1
Replying to
1
1
Replying to
Principle of multiple explanations. Combine both: "Search your feelings with Solomonoff induction, Luke."
1
Replying to
3
3
Replying to
Replying to
Supposedly “the complete stance of meaningness” includes what’s right in nihilism: meaningness.com/eternalism-nih
1
Show replies


