What scenesters reminisce about as old, "real" underground history is usually irrelevant shit that never mattered being duly forgotten.
Conversation
That's a subcultural conceit. What's made legible usually IS the most important stuff. It's just mangled and misinterpreted
Right data, bad analysis. "Underground histories" often pick out data sets that didn't and don't matter.
Replying to
or it's their personal, biased reflections of things that mattered. Eg 'yeah but this bagel place was epic man!' It had cockroaches.
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Replying to
A revisionist account of that idea, yes. That moral victory basically follows political-military-economic victory in the long term.


