They are judging functions. It is true vs. It is right. Logical/ethical
Conversation
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Replying to
True F-types make intuitive judgments of worth that seem absolute to them
10
Replying to
Some of Keirsey's talk about T-F makes it sound as though true T's are sociopaths—
1
Replying to
Replying to
I recall that this INFP group didn't much like Keirsey either.
1
Replying to
I am strong INTP with strong T btw :).
1
Replying to
But all three other axes—E-I, N-S, & J-P—came across as perfectly coherent in Keirsey.
2
Replying to
N/S can be complicated the way T/F can. E/I and J/P are just simpler.
1
Show replies
Replying to
And Keirsey's account of T-F is the only one I know. What others would you suggest?
1
Replying to
published stuff is kinda crappy. Best to just get drunk with Jungian
1
Show replies

