Mycroft: ISTJ, Sherlock: ESTP, Poirot: INTP, Miss Marple: ENTP. Agree, disagree?
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing The 4 ST combinations produce very situated (domain dependent) thinking that kills the NT in 1:1 combat every single time1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Several extended days of long f2f discussions with my own secret gang of Jungian-nerd-out crab types :)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@sarahdoingthing Tip of iceberg can be found in slides 40/41, based on some analysis I actually paid friend to do: https://www.xeromag.com/fun/personality.html …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@sarahdoingthing The key is to ignore the surface typologies and think in terms of the leading/shadow functions and their complex interplay1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@sarahdoingthing For example, INTPs are coded TiNe: Introverted thinking (modeling) and extroverted intuition (communication)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@sarahdoingthing Sorry wrong link, this one, slides 41-42 (The 2 charts): http://www.slideshare.net/vgururao/usc-annenberg …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@sarahdoingthing ESTP otoh (common strategic leader) is SeTi, situated, here-now thinking. Chess intelligence rather than modeling
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing That's kinda the Poirot way. Holmes is less well developed as methodological portrait (since it's mostly short stories)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.