3/ Realistically, there's no other way to get large urban populations up close and personal with the huge non-farm-animal world out there.
Conversation
Replying to
4/ Outside of outliers like Serengiti, 90% of wild world is simply too hidden. You can spend days in jungles full of wildlife and see none
1
2
Replying to
5/ And this assuming you can even make it affordable for large populations to enjoy cheap field contact with wildlife without destroying it
1
Replying to
6/ But OTOH, it seems clear to me now that even the best zoos are prisons that are not worth the cost in misery of, and risk to, animals
2
1
5
Replying to
7/ What we really need is virtual-reality type live/real-time wilderness exploration technologies
2
2
5
Replying to
8/ A good example is spy-in-the-jungle documentary about tigers imdb.com/title/tt122061
1
2
Replying to
9/ A world of difference between that and watching a tiger unhappily pace in a cage and kill a zoo visitor if it gets out accidentally
1
1
Replying to
10/ Image that done in VR: you could be present watching a tiger hunt with the right kind of live, unobtrusive tech
2
1
Replying to
11/ Oddly enough, this may be easier in water. The guys at have done a great job. Need that for land and air, deep in forests etc.
2
2
4
Replying to
I think for a land/jungle version of OpenROV, synthesized mobility (network of cameras) on trees would be better than a tracker bot
Replying to
1
Replying to
You'd have to make it super small, quiet, non-threatening to not spook animals I think. Drones won't do.
5
Show replies
Replying to
side note: I saw clips from this upcoming series radiotimes.com/news/2014-11-1 it is shit-your-pants cool. Just wait!


