Hard to find natural language philosophy on the term "racism," maybe because ordinary language phil died in the 70s? books.google.com/books?id=RokMS
Conversation
Replying to
ribbonfarm isn't touching that with 10-foot pole in case you were getting ideas. Other sites can host race refactorings :)
1
5
Replying to
give me some credit for discretion, I spread the sketchy stuff around elsewhere
2
3
Replying to
(though here I'm not interested in race but in "racism")
1
1
Replying to
both are pretty interesting, but racism is emergent; race is what's really fascinating, biologically
2
Replying to
properly broached—easier done f2f bc that's communication for you—I've never met a "marginalized" person who disagreed
1
Replying to
escaping the emergent nastiness of tribalism, it's human nature to be fascinated by nuances like that of haplotypes
1
1
Replying to
more like dog nature. Cats be like "is that a ball of string? No? Booorrrring."
Replying to
. no way, cats are way better
Cats want to understand things. Dogs just eat $700 Sennheisers and poop at random
4
2
Replying to
how are we saying different things? Cats >> dogs. Also balls of string >> dogs.
2
1
Show replies


