The precautionary principle is already too conservative. You don't need to level up to a *speculative* precautionary principle.
Conversation
Replying to
We’re not yet ready for Asimov’s Laws, but should be thinking ahead.
2
Replying to
. Asimov's Laws made for some moderately good fiction, but are a terminally clueless way to think of engineering risk management
1
3
Replying to
I disagree. If society accepts ~ 3 laws as a norm (or regulation), products that violate norms define risk / liability of developer.
3
Replying to
Society is neither a monolith, nor an ideal. It is usually the risk-averse rentier incumbents with something to lose.

