The precautionary principle is already too conservative. You don't need to level up to a *speculative* precautionary principle.
Conversation
Replying to
We’re not yet ready for Asimov’s Laws, but should be thinking ahead.
2
Replying to
. You don't see bridge builders demanding separate huge government funding for bridge-collapse risk studies. It's part of building
7
1
Replying to
We have more than 3,000(?) years of bridge building experience. Agency and liability balanced risk for RR, utilities, other tech.
1
Replying to
Yeah, and we'll get the experience of managing AI risk by building AIs. It's not time, it's experience.
Replying to
I’d be interested in substance and history of CA and NV legislation re: self-driving vehicles. Know good essay/analysis?

