2/ The structural shift IS happening and will continue. It's just invisible in the data we track. Robots will eat jobs and create new work.
1/ First we jump at "robots eating jobs" out of unfounded fears. Now we dismiss it eagerly with structurally irrelevant near-term data.
-
-
-
3/ Plenty of questions can be asked to poke holes in "jobs back, nothing to see here!" counter-narrative: kinds of jobs, precarity, drop-out
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@vgr if anything, near-term full employment makes the robots eat jobs faster -
@rafaelsolari elaborate? - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@eli_schiff has gotten more true every year for the last 15. Don't expect overnight utopia, fall back if you can't handle frontier realityThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jamespoulos conventional sense of steady paycheck for relatively static expectations from a single employer for years on endThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eli_schiff Benefits beating precarity (on tech-enabled side). Fall back = retreat to old-school job growth sectors like nursing, frackingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@eli_schiff No. It's a bullshit concept that cannot work in social psychology terms. Humans are too restless for that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.