Like @vgr in that essay, I don’t believe in “authenticity.” INauthenticity—duplicity—is a thing for sure. Opposite is not “authenticity” tho
-
-
@vgr Absolutely agree! That’s where the Romantic/monist/etc view goes drastically wrong. -
@Meaningness@vgr triple agree
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@vgr On the other hand, I think meaning is a social thing *from the start*, not an coordination of individual mind-stuff. -
@vgr This is the point that is hardest to get across to (e.g) cognitive scientists. I spent years doing that, in the late 1980s… Some got it - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.