9/ The very idea of "intelligence" as a model of cognition shares common roots with the _testing_ of the intelligence aspect of cognition
Conversation
Replying to
10/ This is ultimately why the idea of the Singularity is so meaningless.
1
3
3
Replying to
11/ Going back to the nutrition analogy, it's like worrying a robot will beat all humans on cholesterol and lung capacity tests.
1
2
2
Replying to
12/ Buzzfeed 2020 headline: "Superhealthy Artificial Organism beats humans on cholesterol test on national TV"
1
4
1
Replying to
13/ So what's a better way to think about AI: Pinker was right that Moravec's Pardox is the most significant idea in AI so far. Here's why
2
4
4
Replying to
14/ Moravec's paradox revealed that early AI was more about anthropomorphism in problem choices by early pioneers than about cognition
2
4
3
Replying to
15/ Due credit to pioneers, but it is no accident that they pursued same metrics that a) inform IQ b) they aced to become academics
2
2
Replying to
16/ Current AI research is extremely exciting not just because it is higher powered but because it is getting away from anthopomorphic roots
3
8
6
Replying to
17/ Given this important break from our own conceits, ideas like the Singularity are not just scientifically ill-posed but reactionary
1
3
Replying to
18/ AI scaremongering is fundamentally an attempt to reimpose an anthropocentric narrative on work that is following a new narrative
1
6
10
Replying to
19/ Once you get rid of anthropocentric lenses, you realize that same mechanisms that worked with other technology risks will work here
Replying to
20/ As with airplanes or plastics or GMO or whatever, we'll learn from trial and error and figure it out
1
2
3
Show replies
Replying to
Interesting points! But what other lens must we consider, besides anthropocentric? Tomatocentric? Spooncentric? Human = lens.
3
1
Replying to
. Thermodynamics/entropy, evolution, information theory... and yes, why not tomato centric/spoon centric?
1
2
Show replies

