2/ They are cargo cults built around cryptic-magic people rather than cryptic-magic technology
-
-
Replying to @vgr
3/ This means that post-founder organization is not just an ingrained set of habits adapted to founder style of leadership
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
4/ Since org embodies *incorrect* theory of its own functioning based on misunderstanding founder, its continued evolution is *irrational*
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @vgr
5/ Simple example: founder known for being a rageholic will induce fear-based habits, but org may not understand why/how rage was effective
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @vgr
6/ After leader leaves, fear may continue to shape new habits, but "headlessly" (random rather than effective)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
7/ A re-org by a new leader is NOT enough to decapitate phantom head if habit-formation meta processes remain the same
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @vgr
8/ This means, the new leader must grok the real logic of old leader and actively deprogram it via reorgs before new programming can stick
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
9/ Think of old org as a sort of callus that forms in the body as a reaction to the "head" behavior. That deep memory callus must be removed
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
10/ Skilled counterprogramming of this sort is what distinguishes founding leaders from people who step into an existing or
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr Ever heard of the Five Monkeys experiment https://vimeo.com/329488071 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.