1/ Client of mine has a theory that all orgs have phantom heads: they act like long-gone founders are still there. This is a great insight.
Conversation
Replying to
2/ They are cargo cults built around cryptic-magic people rather than cryptic-magic technology
3
2
6
Replying to
3/ This means that post-founder organization is not just an ingrained set of habits adapted to founder style of leadership
1
3
Replying to
4/ Since org embodies *incorrect* theory of its own functioning based on misunderstanding founder, its continued evolution is *irrational*
1
4
Replying to
5/ Simple example: founder known for being a rageholic will induce fear-based habits, but org may not understand why/how rage was effective
1
4
Replying to
6/ After leader leaves, fear may continue to shape new habits, but "headlessly" (random rather than effective)
1
3
Replying to
7/ A re-org by a new leader is NOT enough to decapitate phantom head if habit-formation meta processes remain the same
1
1
4
Replying to
8/ This means, the new leader must grok the real logic of old leader and actively deprogram it via reorgs before new programming can stick
1
1
3
Replying to
10/ Skilled counterprogramming of this sort is what distinguishes founding leaders from people who step into an existing or
2
2
Replying to
11// Incorporationg reply into tweetstorm: tl;dr is "Get inside OODA loop of a ghost" :)
2
5

