4/ In a truly Darwinist economy, you wouldn't have corporations. They are NOT analogous to evolvable organisms if you think metaphor through
-
-
Replying to @vgr
5/ The only metaphor that works is product/service design IP as genotype, instances in use as phenotype.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @vgr
6/ For there to be "variation and natural selection" on these genes, the instances have to vary and survive differentially.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
7/ The only way this can really happen is tinkering/bricolage/hacking by end users. This means closest thing to economic Darwinism is....
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
-
Replying to @vgr
9/ Open source as true analog of Darwinism is like selfish gene hypothesis. Orgs as selection units otoh is like individual/group selection
4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
10/ This is update to my old (2007) stab at defining "business genetics" in context of Charles Fine book 'Clockspeed' http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2007/11/25/clockspeed-and-business-genetics-reconsidered/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
11/ This means trying to "innovate" management practices is like trying to evolve a third arm by surgically attaching one.
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
12/ If you actually want to change an organization's DNA, *change what it builds/serves*. Org evolution follows from product innovation
5 replies 5 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @vgr1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@ForbiddenMatrix @msutherl Yeah, I think in fairly predictable ways about this stuff, using a bunch of go-to ideas/patterns.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.