.@gojomo That's actually a poor example; I actually worked on a continuous-thruster orbit-raising model problem in grad school :)
@gojomo But relative is the right way to think of it for any first order process (xdot = ax) until saturation hits.
-
-
@vgr yes, just thought the cheeriness ("small positives outweigh small negatives!") hid measurement/distribution assumption dragons! -
@gojomo So my assumed input is actually deterministic small +ve in basic case. More often, positive-biased, zero-lower-bound process. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.