1/ Thought: when s/w, robots eat bullshit jobs, to the extent that they're done by people with alt support, new jobs don't replace them
Conversation
Replying to
2/ People who HAVE to work or risk starving/becoming homeless are in trouble, but people who just suffer standard of living decrease aren't
1
1
1
Replying to
3/ Income inequality creates leisure class of people not hurting enough to take downward mobility jobs, not free enough to innovate new ones
3
2
4
Replying to
4/ The only thing this class lacks that employment provides is status hierarchy to inhabit.But game worlds etc. are starting to provide that
1
2
3
Replying to
5/ This means "unemployment problem" is meaningless, as it was back in Luddite era,but people not *wanting* to work is likely new phenomenon
1
1
Replying to
6/ We fantasize about leisure, but very few are temperamentally suited to it, and society has never had institutions to support it.
1
4
1
Replying to
7/ So leisure societies of the past have been temporary and "decadent" in a destabilizing way, not just morally objectionable to a few
1
3
1
Replying to
8/ Game worlds are perhaps first true leisure institutions that allow for "stable decadence" -- still morally objectionable to some, but...
1
4
2
Replying to
10/ Unlike TV which is not rich enough to prevent atrophy of the self, games I think are rich enough to sustain non-degenerative leisure
4
4
4
Replying to
12/ Many will find it an outrage that a leisure society can exist for a few (and I don't mean 1%ers) while there is "important" work to do
1
1
Replying to
13/ I think such arguments will be exactly as fallacious as the "Why Mars missions when there are starving children in Africa" argument
1
1
Show replies
