1/ Thought: when s/w, robots eat bullshit jobs, to the extent that they're done by people with alt support, new jobs don't replace them
Conversation
Replying to
2/ People who HAVE to work or risk starving/becoming homeless are in trouble, but people who just suffer standard of living decrease aren't
1
1
1
Replying to
3/ Income inequality creates leisure class of people not hurting enough to take downward mobility jobs, not free enough to innovate new ones
3
2
4
Show replies
Replying to
Not really. I'd just cut/past into my blog if I wanted. Good idea for non-bloggers though.
Replying to
The overheads of every new node in social-media presence are high. Marginal utility has to be through the roof to be worth it
2
Probably, especially with the peculiar variety of beta male involved in PUAhate, GG etc. I think that has other causes tho
Replying to
3
That is true, but I also think temporarily, employment bounce back favors traditionally female dominated jobs (ed/med)
1
1
Replying to
sorry saw this last tweet late. Killer feature would be distribution amplification.
1
1
Replying to
If putting storms on a storm site reaches 10x more people than twitter alone or twitter+blog, I'd jump in.
1
Show replies
Replying to
look at global (not OECD) data...Hans Rosling etc. It is doing so radically. This is a well-worn debate by now. Won't rehash.
