@vgr when adding a feature sounds far less fun than rewriting it
-
-
-
@vgr performance wise it'd be fine. The bigger problem is all the free features frameworks give you. But if you don't need them it's fine - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@ataraxite define "use"? With fcgi and only a small number of expected, non-logged in visitors, still worth MVC frameworking?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr but seriously, once you know framework for one project, makes sense to always start w/ it – no harder at page 0, many advantages
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
with your use case stick with CGI, rails/django total time waste ...
@vgrThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr IMHO: Just before manually adding yet another link between two sets of data feels onerous. Since you're asking, likely now.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr When you’re ready to invest to be able to try out features ~2x more rapidly. Or your model gets relations spanning more than 3 objectsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.