Kahnemann missed a really obvious thing: System 0: not thinking at all. Thinking fast, slow and not at all.
Conversation
Replying to
System 1 has a level of conscious associative/analogical processing...
1
Replying to
hrm so what is not thinking? I thought it processed unconsciously then delegated post hoc rationalization to system 2.
1
Replying to
never getting to post hoc at all. Also, I don't agree with the idea that System 1 is all post-hoc.
2
Replying to
what would a conscious system 1 thought be like? Opaqueness of the mechanism of though seems to be the definition.
1
Replying to
It's fairly clear to me how I do it personally, but most people probably find it opaque because they haven't practiced it consciously
1
Replying to
how do you know it’s not just a system 2 thought tricking you?
1

