Conversation

1/ Naive standard history of computing ignores the role of women entirely beyond Grace Hopper, Ada Lovelace, Klari Von Neumann
1
3
Replying to
2/ Naive feminist revision suggests (but does not show) that women were the pioneers in the early decades, even more than men
1
1
Replying to
3/ The reality is more subtle: men *thought* they were giving women the boring punch-card grunt work and keeping the creative, hard stuff
1
2
Replying to
4/ What really happened: men gave away more power than they realized or intended to. Computing was new; loci of challenges was not obvious
1
2
Replying to
5/ The nominal work WAS tedious grunt work. But it was above data entry or typing levels. It was tedious and precise math.
1
2
Replying to
6/ The nominal work took math skills (diff equations etc.) women were thought to be poor at, but not ingenuity or creativity. Still a win.
1
2
Replying to
7/ But the real win was hidden creative work, tinkering, hacking where male architect types didn't even realize there were challenges.
1
2
Replying to
9/ This involved troubleshooting, improvising etc. to keep early unreliable machines working. This was hidden proto-hacking.
1
2
Replying to
10/ Men largely did the high level architecture of programs or built the machines. But women led (AFAICT) in gluing the two together.
1
1
Show replies