1/ Lit surveys and discovery exercises serve 2 purposes, not 1: providing idea fuel and containing downside of potential blindside errors
-
-
Replying to @vgr
2/ Conflating the two purposes leads to misery and terrible work because very different subsets of discovery findings drive them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
3/ For idea fuel, you want to throw to choose from the ends of the distribution: most-cited and least-cited.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
4/ The most cited work gives you foundations to build on. Obscure works give you novel starting points that have chance for high ROI
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @vgr
5/ For the 2nd purpose of risk-containment, it's the middle of the distribution that matters. You'll illuminate your blindsides there.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
6/ If you look for both inspiration and risk mitigation in the middle, you'll do low-value, incremental work that is safe.
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
7/ If you look for both inspiration and risk mitigation at the ends, you'll likely make one or more bonehead blunders.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
8/ If you look for ideas in the middle, risk-mitigation in the edges, you'll end up with an uninspired, non-magisterial lumpensynthesis.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
9/ But if you look for ideas at the distribution ends and risk mitigation in the middle, you're in the game for potentially big hits.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @vgr
10/ Nobody told me this when I was doing academic research, but with blogging, if you don't work this way, you're basically dead.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
11/ Because in blogging, unlike academia, there's no room for playing it safe. You're either in it for potential hits, or you're on way out
-
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.