We know: usefully coding robots is 100x harder than building them. Now learning: getting intel out of data is 100x harder than gathering it
-
-
Replying to @abestanway
@abestanway Most insights are trivial, flawed or both and as yet, can't even compete well even with intuitive, low-data human narrative.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @abestanway
@abestanway In 20-30 years, when the tech matures, it'll put low-data narrative out of business altogether. Like drones, driverless cars2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @abestanway
@abestanway there's a Moravec's paradox in data too. The seemingly hard-to-mine intel is easy, seemingly easy intel is hard.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
@abestanway Many "obvious" questions are so hard are we pretend they're the wrong/unimportant/ill-posed instead of admitting we can't answer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@abestanway exactly. Yet, it's actually in the addressable set. I'm fiddling with a lifelogger for just such q's. https://github.com/vgururao/lifelogger …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.