@johnrobb nope. All big things begin with tinkering. By the time moralizing begins, fundamental DNA of tech is set. Medium is message.
-
-
Replying to @vgr1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @doriantaylor
@doriantaylor@johnrobb If you mean that seriously, that begins with tinkering with ideas. Like how you once refactored MVP as EDP for me2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doriantaylor
@doriantaylor@johnrobb cooking ~ tinkering, roughly. Intent is fine. it's explicitly *moral* intent I think is unnecessary and a drag1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doriantaylor
@doriantaylor@johnrobb Things like explicit moral manifesto a la Ello. Otherwise, term is vacuous. There are lived values in all behavior.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@johnrobb oh, yeah. In that case I just invoke Gall's law (I'm sure you're familiar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gall_%28author%29#Gall.27s_law … )—central planning no-no.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doriantaylor
@doriantaylor@johnrobb we converge :). Explicit moral intents imo always lead to authoritarian, overspecified plans.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@doriantaylor Moral intent is the secret sauce behind western technological advances for over four centuries. It gave them direction.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@johnrobb @doriantaylor I'm willing to buy it where there's direct motivation, like vaccines. For default, no. Morality lags, not leads.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.