@vgr Your confusing tinkering with innovation. That's a common error.
-
-
Replying to @vgr1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @doriantaylor
@doriantaylor@johnrobb If you mean that seriously, that begins with tinkering with ideas. Like how you once refactored MVP as EDP for me2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doriantaylor
@doriantaylor@johnrobb cooking ~ tinkering, roughly. Intent is fine. it's explicitly *moral* intent I think is unnecessary and a drag1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doriantaylor
@doriantaylor@johnrobb Things like explicit moral manifesto a la Ello. Otherwise, term is vacuous. There are lived values in all behavior.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@doriantaylor@johnrobb Heck, tinkering itself is lived value of playfulness, and pursuing it is implicitly a pursuit of moral intent.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
@vgr@johnrobb Yup I see it as analogous to phase states solid->liquid->gas :: flânerie->bricolage->project->product: http://doriantaylor.com/what-i-do1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@doriantaylor @johnrobb Though, I generalize Gall's law to include doctrinaire decentralization/distribution intents.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.