There are 2 ways to think: Bond style, with tools from Q, or Bourne style (copied by Bond 2.0), with whatever is around. I prefer latter.
@GordonBrianR I don't see the resemblance. It's waterfall vs agile, purist vs pragmatic.
-
-
@vgr sure there is a fluidity in Bourne, but that was because he was broadly trained whereas Bond was narrowly trained.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@vgr I always felt one of the weaknesses of the movies was the lack of an account regarding how he could be so skilled, so broadly.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@PGuru714
@vgr he would be he agile - less dependent on formal structure.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.